Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP

Docket 1:19-cv-10578

Filed
2019-11-14
Terminated
2021-08-20
Case type
cv

Outcome

other judgment · defendant

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=1910578 FILEDATE=11/14/2019 DISP=17, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=2; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED:_9/13/21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Shukla, Plaintiff, 19-cv-10578 (AJN) —y— ORDER Deloitte Consulting LLP, Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court has received Plaintiff's motion entitled “Motion for Relief from Final Order (Doc# 323 and 327) and Motion for Default Judgment.” Dkt. No. 328-330. The motions are DENIED. This resolves Dkt. No. 328. The Court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 13, 2021 AM \) i New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.