JudgeFinder

Bey v. Carillo

Docket 1:25-cv-02099

Filed
2025-03-10
Terminated
2025-06-11
Case type
cv

Outcome

other judgment · defendant

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2502099 FILEDATE=03/10/2025 DISP=17, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=2; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn eK JEREMY JACOB MORALES BEY, Plaintiff, -against- 25 CIVIL 2099 (KMW) JUDGMENT OFFICER CARRILLO, BADGE #973983; LIEUTENANT BAUTISTA; NYPD PRECINCT #020; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS DIVISION, Defendants. wn eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 10, 2025, the Court has dismissed the complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). To the extent Plaintiff seeks to remove his state court criminal proceedings to this court, his request is denied as improper, and the case is remanded to the state court. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 11, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court j wY ) BY: f. Mange Deputy Clerk

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.