Castillo v. Social Security Administration

Docket 1:21-cv-00300

Filed
2021-04-01
Terminated
2021-12-01
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=84 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2100300 FILEDATE=04/01/2021 DISP=11, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO NATHAN L. CASTILLO, Plaintiff, v. No. CV 21-300 CG KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AWARD ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Nathan L. Castillo’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, with Memorandum in Support (the “Motion”), (Doc. 22), filed March 1, 2022. In the Motion, Mr. Castillo indicates he seeks attorney fees and paralegal fees in the amount of $6,000.00. (Doc. 22 at 1). Further, the parties agree that “[p]ayment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have in connection with this action,” and that “if Plaintiff’s counsel ultimately receives an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), she must refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).” Id. The Court, having reviewed the Motion under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and noting that the Motion is unopposed, finds the Motion is well-taken and shall be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $6,000.00 in attorney and paralegal fees pursuant to EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, made payable to Plaintiff but mailed 1 Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on July 9, 2021. to Plaintiffs attorney. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiffs counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.