Castillo v. Social Security Administration

Docket 1:21-cv-00300

Filed
2021-04-01
Terminated
2021-12-01
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=84 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2100300 FILEDATE=04/01/2021 DISP=11, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO NATHAN L. CASTILLO, Plaintiff, V. No. CV 21-300 CG KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ' Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(q) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi's Unopposed Motion and Brief to Reverse and Remand for Further Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (the “Motion”), (Doc. 19), filed November 30, 2021. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and noting it is unopposed, finds the Motion is well-taken and shall be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision in this matter is REVERSED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.” IT IS SO ORDERED. THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 'Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on July 9, 2021. ? The Court will enter a separate order of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.