Opinions and documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
MICHAEL EVANS, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) C.A. No. 20-1663 (MN)
)
DOC COMMISSIONER, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM ORDER
At Wilmington, this 5th day of April 2021:
1. Introduction. Pro se Plaintiffs in this case, all of whom were incarcerated at the
Howard R. Young Correctional Institution when they commenced this action, filed this lawsuit
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 8, 2020. (D.I. 2). They appear pro se. (D.I. 5).
Before the Court are several motions filed by Plaintiffs Michael Evans (“Evans”) and Eric Harris
(“Harris”). (D.I. 57, 58, 142, 143).
2. The Complaint. On February 17, 2021, this Court denied as moot Evans’ motion
to amend because Evans had been dismissed as a Plaintiff. (See D.I. 12, 31). Evans and several
other dismissed Plaintiffs were recently reinstated. (See D.I. 147). Accordingly, this Court will
vacate denial of the motion to amend and grant the motion to amend. (D.I. 12). The Amended
Complaint at Docket Item 13 shall be the operative pleading.
3. Motions for Reconsideration. Evans has filed two motions for reconsideration.
The first asks that rather than pay the required $350 filing fee, he pay only $20 or $25 due to his
present hardship. (D.I. 57). The motion will be denied. Section 1915 provides that if a prisoner
brings a civil action in forma pauperis, he shall be required to pay the full amount of the filing fee.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Evans opted to file this lawsuit, and he is required by statute to pay the
filing fee, either by paying the filing fee in full or in payments as assessed by the Court. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1914; 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
4. Evans’ second motion for reconsideration states that the original named Plaintiffs
did not receive a copy of this Court’s January 13, 2021 Order (D.I. 10). (D.I. 58). The Order
required Plaintiffs who commenced this action, as well as newly added Plaintiffs, to each submit
requests to proceed in forma pauperis (Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying
Fees or Costs, AO Form 240) and to provide this Court with a certified copy of his respective
prison trust fund account statement within 30 days from the date the January 13, 2021 order was
sent. (See D.I. 10). The motion will be granted. Plaintiffs who have not yet submitted an
Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (AO Form 240) and a
certified copy of their respective prison trust fund account statement will be given additional time
to do so.
5. Motion for Emergency Hearing. Evans and Harris move for an “in person”
emergency hearing to address COVID protective measures within the Delaware Department of
Correction and immediate release. (D.I. 142). In addition, Harris filed a separate letter seeking
immediate release. (D.I. 146). The motion will be denied.
6. The remedy requested lies in the Delaware Courts. “If an inmate’s medical
circumstances change in a way that warrants sentence reduction, then the proper vehicle to deliver
such relief is an application by the Department of Corrections under 11 Del. C. 4217. State v.
Desmond, ID. No. 91009844DI, 2020 WL 7630768, n.6 (Del. Super. Oct. 21, 2020). To date,
however, “no special early release rule or procedure has been created to address the current
COVID-19 health crisis.” Id. at n.5 (quoting State v. Hampton, ID No. 1601004059, 2020 WL
4284327 (Del. Supr. Jul. 27, 2020)).
7. Motion to Stop Denial of Right of Access to the Court. Evans seeks relief on
the grounds that he has “continuously been denied his legal mail sent to him by this Court.
(D.I. 143). More particularly, Evans states that he did not receive a March 10, 2021 letter with
an enclosed docket sheet and contends the fault lies with HRYCI. The motion will be denied
without prejudice to renew should Evans continue to have legal mail issues. The Clerk of Court
will be directed to provide Evans with a copy of the court docket.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, based upon the above discussion:
1. That portion of the February 17, 2021 Order (D.I. 31) denying the motion to amend
(D.I. 12) is VACATED. The motion to amend is GRANTED. (DI. 12). The Amended
Complaint at Docket Item 13 shall be the operative pleading. The Clerk of Court is directed
reflect on the Court Docket that the first named defendant is properly named as DOC
Commissioner Claire DeMatteis.
2. Plaintiff Michael Evans’ motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (D.I. 57).
3. Plaintiff Michael Evans’ motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. (D.I. 58).
Plaintiffs who have not yet submitted an Application to Proceed in District Court without
Prepaying Fees or Costs (AO Form 240) and a certified copy of their respective prison trust fund
account statement will be given 30 days from the date this order is sent to do so.
4. Plaintiffs Michael Evans’ and Eric Harris’ motion for an emergency hearing 1s
DENIED. (D.I. 142).
5. Plaintiff Michael Evans’ motion to stop denial of the right of access to the court is
DENIED without prejudice to renew. (D.I. 143). The Clerk of Court is directed to provide
Evans a free copy of the court docket.
United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.