Keith v. United States

Docket 1:20-cv-04410

Filed
2020-06-04
Terminated
2022-07-08
Case type
cv

Outcome

other dismissal

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2004410 FILEDATE=06/04/2020 DISP=14, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee K DAVID KEITH, Movant, -against- 25 CIVIL 3298 (GHW) 20 CIVIL 4410 (GHW) 15 CR 827 (GHW) JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order dated September 26, 2025, Mr. Keith’s Motion is denied. Mr. Keith’s first claim lacks substantive merit and the remaining claims fall outside of the scope of Rule 60(b). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Mr. Keith has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, so the Court denies a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Judgment is entered for the Respondent; accordingly, Mr. Keith’s civil action, David Keith v. United States, No. 1:25-cv- 3298-GHW case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 29, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court BY: dK, MLANGC Deputy Clerk

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.