UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
JESSICA O.,1 Case No. 6:19-cv-000732-MTK
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
COMMISSIONER, Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
_________________________________________
KASUBHAI, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Jessica O. brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner’s final
decision denying her application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act.
ECF No. 1. On March 16, 2020, pursuant to a Stipulated Motion for Remand, the Court entered
judgment reversing and remanding the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 US.C. § 405(g). ECF
Nos. 17, 18.
Plaintiff’s attorney now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ECF No.
23. Defendant takes no position with respect to the request. Id. Applying the standards set
1 In the interest of privacy, the Court uses only the first name and last name initial of non-
government parties whose identification could affect Plaintiff’s privacy.
by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Court has reviewed the record in this
case and finds that the requested fees are reasonable.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF No. 23) is hereby
granted as follows: Kevin Kerr is allowed an attorney’s fee under the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 406(b), in the amount of $19,000.00, to be paid in accordance with agency policy.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund the amount of $149.88 already received by counsel (net of
Treasury seizure) under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Any funds withheld by the
Commissioner in anticipation of an order under Section 406(b), less an administrative
assessment pursuant to 42 US.C. 406(d), may be paid to Kevin Kerr, using the information on
file with the Agency, consistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 5th day of May 2025.
s/ Mustafa T. Kasubhai
MUSTAFA T. KASUBHAI (He / Him)
United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.