Ovalle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Docket 6:19-cv-00732

Filed: 2019-05-09
Terminated: 2020-03-16
Case type: cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=79 OFFICE=6 DOCKET=1900732 FILEDATE=05/09/2019 DISP=11, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

Party and firm records are not available for this case.

Panel

No sourced panel votes are recorded.

Opinions and documents

Ovalle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration 2025-05-05 · Source
Ovalle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration 2020-06-16 · Source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
                      DISTRICT OF OREGON 

JESSICA OVALLE,                                           6:19-cv-00732-BR 
     Plaintiff, 
vs. 
                                                              ORDER 
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 
     Defendant. 

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $1,949.88. shall be awarded to 
Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C, § 2412. Attorney fees will be 
paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies 
for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in 
Astrue y. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 
If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney and 
mailed to Plaintiffs attorney’s office as follows: Kevin Kerr, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 
97293.  If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt 
shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. 
            Me 
DATED this  |¥    day of  Sf Ln         , 2020. 
                                                              \ 

                                   Anna    Brown 
                                   United States,District Judge 
                                            HN

Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.