1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DAVID ANTHONY DEAN, No. 2:25-cv-03120-EFB (HC)
12 Petitioner,
13 v. ORDER
14 WARDEN,
15 Respondent.
16
17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or submitted a request
19 to proceed in forma pauperis.
20 The application attacks a conviction issued by the Riverside County Superior Court.
21 While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was
22 convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any
23 and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s application are more
24 readily available in Riverside County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).
25 ////
26 ////
27 ////
28 ////
] Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2 This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of
3 | California.
4
5 || Dated: November 20, 2025 4 A Veutid 2 Sie £ JA
6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.