Andrews v. Social Security Administration

Docket 1:25-cv-00986

Filed
2025-10-09
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=84 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2500986 FILEDATE=10/09/2025 DISP=11, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CIARA P. ANDREWS, Plaintiff, vs. CIV. NO. 1:25-cv-00986-KG-KK FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER On consideration of Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand to Agency pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (ECF No. 22), the Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision in this matter under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.1 See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993). /s/Kenneth J. Gonzales___________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE • Please note that this document has been electronically filed. To verify its authenticity, please refer to the Digital File Stamp on the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) accompanying this document. Electronically filed documents can be found on the Court’s PACER public access system. 1 The Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58. Submitted by: s/ Allan D. Berger ALLAN D. BERGER ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Approved by: s/ electronically approved LAURA JOELLEN JOHNSON Armstrong Johnson Law, LLC ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.