Opinions and documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
BRENT SCOBEY, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 1:25-cv-00163-MTS
)
MARK DOBBS, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Brent Scobey’s Motion for
Relief from Judgment. Doc. [11]. The Court previously dismissed this action without
prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with two Court orders. See Doc. [9]. Because
Plaintiff represents that he did not receive copies of the Court’s orders, Doc. [11], the
Court will grant his Motion. But the Court admonishes Plaintiff that he has an
affirmative duty to monitor the docket in this case. See Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389
F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (joined by Roberts, J.) (citing United States ex rel.
McAllan v. City of New York, 248 F.3d 48, 53 (2d Cir. 2001) (per curiam)); Casimir v.
Sunrise Fin., Inc., 299 F. App’x 591, 593 (7th Cir. 2008) (citing Soliman v. Johanns, 412
F.3d 920, 922 (8th Cir. 2005)). Thus, even if Plaintiff represents that he does not receive
future orders, that alone will be insufficient to excuse his failure to comply.
Since the Court will reopen this case, the Court now reviews Plaintiff’s
Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Doc. [13]. In his application, Plaintiff notes
that he has $1,000 in cash or his bank accounts and has a monthly income of $4,200. Id.
And he details only $1,300 in monthly expenses. /d. Based on these figures he provides,
the Court will deny his Application and order him to prepay the $405 filing fee in this
matter no later than Wednesday, May 06, 2026. See Griffin v. Centurion, LLC, 2:25-cv-
0062-MTS, 2026 WL 696535, at *2 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 12, 2026) (noting district courts have
wide discretion in determining whether a plaintiff should be allowed to proceed in forma
pauperis).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment,
Doc. [11], is GRANTED. The Order of Dismissal previously entered is VACATED,
and this action is REOPENED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis, Doc. [13], is DENIED. No later than Wednesday, May 06, 2026,
Plaintiff shall prepay the $405 filing fee in full. If Plaintiff fails to do so by that date, the
Court will dismiss this action without further notice.
Dated this 15th day of April 2026. |) □□
ul
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
_2-
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.