List v. Commissioner of Social Security

Docket 1:25-cv-01996

Filed
2025-09-19
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Gavin Michael List, ) CASE NO. 1:25-CV-01996 Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS -vs- ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER Commissioner of Social Security ) Defendant. ) The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for child disability benefits (“CDB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and this Court referred the case to the Magistrate Judge for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation recommending that the Court VACATE and REMAND the Commissioner’s decision. Doc. 13. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. The Commissioner responded that it would not file objections to the R&R. Thus, any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Commissioner’s final decision is VACATED and REMANDED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 17, 2026 /s/ John R. Adams_______________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.