IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
DARIAN POSTELL, CEO of DieRich )
Entertainment / Americorp, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) CV 125-211
)
JUDGE JESSE STONE; JARED )
WILLIAMS; TIERRA WILLIAMS; )
RAHMAN BOWICK; and )
LARRY SMITH, )
)
Defendants. )
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, detained at Charles B. Webster Detention Center in Augusta, Georgia,
commenced the above-captioned case pro se and requested permission to proceed in forma
pauperis (“IFP”). On October 3, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to return his Prisoner Trust
Fund Account Statement and Consent to Collection of Fees forms within thirty days and
advised Plaintiff all prisoners, even those proceeding IFP, must pay the filing fee of $350.00
in full. (See doc. no. 7, pp. 2-4); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff was cautioned failure to
respond would be an election to have this case voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. (Doc.
no. 7, p. 5.) The time to respond has passed, and Plaintiff has not submitted the documents
required by the Court’s October 3rd Order. Nor has he provided the Court with any
explanation why he has not complied.
Plaintiff cannot proceed IFP unless he submits the requisite Trust Fund Account
Statement and consents to collection of the entire $350.00 filing fee in installments. Wilson
v. Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315, 1319, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915). Plaintiff
has been warned that failing to return the necessary IFP papers would be an election to have
his case voluntarily dismissed. (See doc. no. 7, p. 5.) As Plaintiff has neither fulfilled the
requirements for proceeding IFP, nor paid the full filing fee, the Court REPORTS and
RECOMMENDS this case be DISMISSED without prejudice and this civil action be
CLOSED.
SO REPORTED and RECOMMENDED this 10th day of November, 2025, at Augusta,
Georgia.
fh. k bo
BRIAN K ERPS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.