Williams v. Vintage India NYC LLC

Docket 1:25-cv-07667

Filed
2025-09-16
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

settled

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2507667 FILEDATE=09/16/2025 DISP=13, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: JEFFERY WILLIAMS, DATE FILED:__ 9/17/2025 Plaintiff, -against- 25-CV-07667 (MMG) VINTAGE INDIA NYC LLC and LEXINGTON 132 ORDER REALTY LLC, Defendants. MARGARET M. GARNETT, United States District Judge: It is hereby ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint upon each Defendant, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good- faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether Plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. See e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.Ath 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district’s court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (7.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the parties shall in the joint letter request that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) proceed with an initial status conference. The letter shall also indicate whether Defendants intend to answer or move to dismiss the complaint. If Defendants intend to move to dismiss, the letter shall briefly (in no more than one paragraph) set forth Defendants’ basis for their anticipated motions. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is STAYED pending the submission of the joint letter. After the parties file the letter, the Court will enter an order setting a deadline for Defendants to answer or setting a briefing schedule for the motion to dismiss. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this Order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court’s Individual Rules & Practices (“Individual Rules”), available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-margaret-m- garnett, forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Individual Rules to that party personally. Dated: September 17, 2025 New York, New York SO ORDERED. United States District Judge

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.