DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:
JEFFERY WILLIAMS, DATE FILED:__ 9/17/2025
Plaintiff,
-against- 25-CV-07667 (MMG)
VINTAGE INDIA NYC LLC and LEXINGTON 132 ORDER
REALTY LLC,
Defendants.
MARGARET M. GARNETT, United States District Judge:
It is hereby ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and
complaint upon each Defendant, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-
faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether
Plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. See e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N.
Am. Ltd., 36 F.Ath 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44
(2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also
discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district’s court-annexed mediation
program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (7.e., within forty-five
(45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter
informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the
parties shall in the joint letter request that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or to a
Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference (and indicate a preference between the two
options), or (2) proceed with an initial status conference. The letter shall also indicate whether
Defendants intend to answer or move to dismiss the complaint. If Defendants intend to move to
dismiss, the letter shall briefly (in no more than one paragraph) set forth Defendants’ basis for
their anticipated motions.
The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is STAYED
pending the submission of the joint letter. After the parties file the letter, the Court will enter an
order setting a deadline for Defendants to answer or setting a briefing schedule for the motion to
dismiss.
Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this Order are
directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared
by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court’s Individual Rules &
Practices (“Individual Rules”), available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-margaret-m-
garnett, forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the
identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy
of this order and the Individual Rules to that party personally.
Dated: September 17, 2025
New York, New York
SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.