(PC) Hardy v. Romero

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 KRISTIN LEE HARDY, No. 2:25-cv-2638 CSK P 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 15 ROMERO et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. §1983. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement 20 conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Allison Claire to conduct a 21 settlement conference at the California State Prison, Sacramento (CSP-SAC), 100 Prison Road, 22 Represa, CA 95671 on October 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will issue any necessary 23 transportation order in due course. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 26 October 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. at SAC. 27 2. Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the 28 Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The 2 individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and 3 authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose 4 behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the 5 parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. An 6 authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to 7 comply with the requirement of full authority to settle1. 8 3. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than October 9 8, 2026 to acorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement 10 statement to U.S. District Court, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 11 95814 “Attn: Magistrate Judge Allison Claire” so it arrives no later than October 8, 12 2026. Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of Confidential 13 Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)). 14 Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on 15 any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” with 16 the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 17 The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, 18 typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 19 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 20 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds 21 22 1 23 While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement 24 conferences… .” Unittehd States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9 Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the 25 mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any 26 settlemthent terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 tFh.2d 648, 653 (7 Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9 Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the 27 settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The 28 purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to 1 2 upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ 3 likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major 4 issues in dispute. 5 c. A summary of the proceedings to date. 6 d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, 7 and trial. 8 e. The relief sought. 9 f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 10 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. 11 g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement 12 conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay. 13 h. If the parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims 14 not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above, 15 including case number(s) if applicable. 16 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order on the Out to 17 Court Desk at SAC via fax at (916) 294-3116 or via email. 18 19 || Dated: August 24, 2026 4 20 C Am Spe IL CHI SOO KIM a1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 Hard2638 .med/2 24 25 26 27 28