Opinions and documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
FRESNO DIVISION
9
10 Abel Ascencion Contreras, Case No. 1:25-cv-01182-EPG
11 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
12 AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY
v. FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT
13 TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
14 Frank J. Bisignano1, JUSTICE ACT; ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
15 SECURITY,
16
Defendant.
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
18
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
19
attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED
20
AND 00/100 ($6,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.
21
§ 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. §1920.
22
This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of
23
24
25
1 Frank J. Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security on May 7,
26 2025. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank J.
Bisignano should be substituted for Leland Dudek as the defendant in this suit. No
27
further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of
section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
1 Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
2 §§ 1920, 2412(d).
3 Plaintiff was the prevailing party in this matter and Plaintiff is an individual
4 whose net worth does not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the civil action was filed.
5
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
6
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney.
7
Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this
8
Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program
9
(31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to
10
Plaintiff and not to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order,
11
the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned his right to EAJA fees to
12
his attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset
13
under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the
14
Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney,
15
16 JONATHAN O. PEÑA-MANCINAS at the firm, PEÑA & BROMBERG, PC.
17 However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner
18 cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining
19 EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check or electronic fund transfer (EFT) made
20 out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney, JONATHAN O. PEÑA-
21 MANCINAS at the firm, PEÑA & BROMBERG, PC.
22 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
23 EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
24
Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute
25
a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel
26
including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with
27
this action.
1 The parties further agree that the EAJA award is without prejudice to the right of
2 Plaintiff’s attorney to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42
3 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. §
4 2412(c)(1) (2006).
5
Respectfully submitted,
6
7
Dated: July 6, 2026 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña
8 J ONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
10
Dated: July 6, 2026 ERIC GRANT
11 United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE
12
Head of Program Litigation 1
13 Law & Policy
Social Security Administration
14
15 By: _*_Marcelo N. Illarmo
Marcelo N. Illarmo
16
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
17 Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
18
obtained via email on July 6, 2026).
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER
2
3 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access
4 || to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation”),
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND
7 | FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 ($6,500.00) as authorized by the Equal Access to
8 || Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the
° Stipulation.
10
11
12 || IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated July 7, 2026 [Jee hey
14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.