UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)
ELIZABETH W., : Case No. 3:25-cv-00291
:
Plaintiff, : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
: (by full consent of the parties)
vs. :
:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL :
SECURITY, :
:
Defendant. :
DECISION AND ENTRY
This case is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of
Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (Doc. No. 13).
Specifically, the parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney fees in the amount
of $3,800.00, and no costs, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims
Plaintiff may have under the EAJA in the above case. The award of attorney fees will
satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees, costs, and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in
this case. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff, not her attorney, and can be offset to
satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States under Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586 (2010). Plaintiff and Defendant move that the Court award Plaintiff
EAJA fees of $3,800.00, and no costs, for a total award of $3,800.00.
After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that
Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, Defendant agrees to direct that the
award be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly
signed by Plaintiff.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The parties’ Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney’s Fees
Under the EAJA (Doc. No. 13) is accepted and Defendant
shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees of $3,800.00, and no costs,
for a total award of $3,800.00;
2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this
Decision and Entry, whether Plaintiff owes a pre-existing
debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-
existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award
directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA
assignment signed by Plaintiff; and
3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Caroline H. Gentry
Caroline H. Gentry
United States Magistrate Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.