1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 MELVIN SIMMONS, JR., No. 1:25-cv-01070-SKO (HC)
12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
13 v. THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14 JEFFREY MACOMBER, Secretary, et al.,
15 Respondents.
16
17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because Petitioner challenges a Los Angeles County Superior
19 Court conviction, venue is proper for this action in the Central District of California. Thus, the
20 Court will order the petition transferred.
21 When a state prisoner files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal
22 judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is
23 presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C.
24 § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364
25 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a
26 sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman,
27 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or sentences are preferably
28 heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968).
1 Section 2241 further states that, rather than dismissing an improperly filed action, a district court,
2 “in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice[,] may transfer” the habeas petition
3 to another federal district for hearing and determination. Id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court
4 may transfer any civil action “to any other district or division where it might have been brought”
5 for convenience of parties or “in the interest of justice”).
6 Here, although the claims are not clear, Petitioner challenges the underlying judgment of
7 conviction in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. He alleges the judgment is void, worthless,
8 and unconstitutional, and he seeks immediate release. Therefore, venue is proper in the Central
9 District of California.
10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the
11 United States District Court for the Central District of California.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 Dated: August 28, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.