IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JEREMY VANVALKENBURG,
Plaintiff, 8:25CV501
vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
U.S MARSHALL,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Filing No. 2. The Court has received a certified
copy of Plaintiff’s trust account information. Filing No. 8. Plaintiff is
permitted to proceed IFP.
Prisoner plaintiffs are required to pay the full amount of the Court’s
$350.00 filing fee by making monthly payments to the Court, even if the
prisoner is proceeding IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Prison Litigation Reform
Act “makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner
brings a civil action or files an appeal.” In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529–30 (8th
Cir. 1997); Jackson v. N.P. Dodge Realty Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 951 (D. Neb.
2001).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff must pay an initial partial
filing fee in the amount of 20 percent of the greater of Plaintiff’s average
monthly account balance or average monthly deposits for the six months
preceding the filing of the Complaint. Here, the Court finds the initial partial
filing fee is $3.70, based on average monthly deposits in the amount of $37.07.1
Plaintiff must pay this initial partial filing fee within 30 days, or his case will
be subject to dismissal. Plaintiff may request an extension of time if one is
needed.
In addition to the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff must “make monthly
payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the
prisoner’s account.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The statute places the burden on
the prisoner’s institution to collect the additional monthly payments and
forward them to the Court as follows:
After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be
required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding
month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency
having custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the
prisoner’s account to the clerk of the court each time the amount
in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Therefore, after payment in full of the initial partial
filing fee, Plaintiff’s institution must collect the remaining installments of the
filing fee and forward the payments to the Court.
Plaintiff is advised he will remain responsible for the entire filing fee, as
long as he is a prisoner, even if the case is dismissed at some later time. See
In re Tyler, 110 F.3d at 529–30; Jackson, 173 F. Supp. 2d at 951.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1 Plaintiff provided trust account information for two months preceding the filing of the
Complaint, and the Court calculated his initial partial filing fee based on the available
information.
2
1. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, Filing No. 2, is
granted.
2. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.70 within 30
days unless the Court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a
written motion.
3. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiffs institution
must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the Court.
4, The Clerk’s office is directed to send a copy of this order to the
appropriate official at Plaintiffs institution.
5. The Clerk’s office is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: October 9, 2025: initial partial
filing fee payment due.
6. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial
filing fee, the next step in Plaintiffs case will be for the Court to conduct an
initial review of Plaintiffs claims to determine whether summary dismissal is
appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial
review in its normal course of business.
Dated this 9th day of September, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
J M. Gerrard
S¢ehior United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.