Board of Education for The Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools v. Lucas

Docket 1:25-cv-00762

Filed
2025-08-08
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR THE GALLUP-MCKINLEY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:25-cv-00762-KG-JFR ANDREA R. LUCAS, in her official capacity as Acting Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This Order is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff Board of Education for the Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools filed this action for declaratory and injunctive relief seeking review of an agency action. Doc. 1. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants’ ongoing investigation of alleged unlawful employment practices by Plaintiff violates the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Doc. 1 at 2. Plaintiff seeks an order setting aside Defendants’ Charge of Discrimination as unlawful, restraining Defendants from further investigation, quashing all subpoenas, and enjoining Defendants from filing any future charges “that would be inconsistent with the Court’s order.” Id. at 21. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42 permits the Court to consolidate actions that “involve a common question of law or fact.” The Court has broad discretion in determining whether to consolidate cases. Cheney v. Judd, 429 F. Supp. 3d 931, 936 (D.N.M. 2019). It appears the issues in this case involve common questions of law and fact as the issues in EEOC v. Gallup- McKinley County Schools, No. 1:25-mc-025-MLG (D.N.M. filed Aug. 21, 2025) and EEOC v. Gallup-McKinley County Schools, No. 1:26-mc-00019-KG (D.N.M. filed April 27, 2026). In those cases, the EEOC seeks to enforce administrative subpoenas issued by the Commission in its investigation into alleged practices and patterns of racial discrimination against Native American employees and applicants by Plaintiff. The Court orders the parties, within 14 days of this order, to show cause why the present case should not be consolidated with the aforementioned actions initiated by the EEOC. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Kenneth J. Gonzales___________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE • Please note that this document has been electronically filed. To verify its authenticity, please refer to the Digital File Stamp on the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) accompanying this document. Electronically filed documents can be found on the Court’s PACER public access system.

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.