JudgeFinder

Ware v. Boyles

Docket 4:25-cv-01185

Filed
2025-08-04
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

other dismissal

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=65 OFFICE=4 DOCKET=2501185 FILEDATE=08/04/2025 DISP=14, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SUPASTAR WARE, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 4:25-CV-01185 SPM JOHN BOYLES, et al., Defendants. OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ECF No. 41]. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see ECF Nos. 36 and 37; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 41] is DENIED. Dated this 18" day of September, 2025. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.