Linenko v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Docket 6:25-cv-01360

Filed
2025-08-01
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=79 OFFICE=6 DOCKET=2501360 FILEDATE=08/01/2025 DISP=11, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581 brucebrewerusdccases @ gmail.com PO Box 421 West Linn, OR 97068 503-621-6633 Attorney for plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON KIMBERLY LINENKO, Case No. 6:25-cv-01360-AR Plaintiff, ORDER - EAJA v. COMMISSIONER, of Social Security Administration, Defendant. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall pay Plaintiff an attorney fee, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $1,266.45; Plaintiff prevailed and the parties stipulated to the EAJA motion and the fee requested thereby. It is further ORDERED that, if there is no offsetable debt under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), Defendant shall pay the fee directly to Plaintiff’s attorney, by check made payable to Bruce Brewer, and shall send the check to Plaintiff’s attorney at his business address: PO Box 421, West Linn, OR 97068. If offsetable debt exists pursuant to Ratliff, then it is ORDERED that the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office at the address stated above. It is so ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2026. elHpnirable Jeff Armistead ited States Magistrate Judge 1-ORDER (EAJA)

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.