1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
all viti, Case No. 2:25-cv-01349-CDS-MDC
5 Plaintiff, ORDER
6 Vs.
, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.,
3 Defendant.
9 On 05/19/2026, the Court ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint in this case by June 19,
10 ECF No. 21. However, the Court has received notice that the 05/19/2026 Order was not
11 |! deliverable to the address currently provided by plaintiff on the docket. See ECF No. 18.
12 Accordingly,
13 IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiff must provide a notice of change of address no later than
September 18, 2026. Failure to do so may result in the Court dismissing the case. See LR IA 3-1 (An
15 attorney or pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of
16 mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. Failure to comply with this rule
V7 may result in the dismissal of the action....).
18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
19 If plaintiff timely provides the notice of change of address, he must then file an amended
20 complaint in this case by October 5, 2026. Failure to do so may result in the Court dismissing the case.
21 DATED: September 4, 2026. J pp DP □
%3 Ufiited StateyMagistr € Judge
24
25
NOTICE
1
Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and
2
recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk
3
4 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal
5 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified
6 time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file
7 objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues
8 waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the
9
District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch.
10
Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, plaintiff must immediately file written
11
notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon
12
each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel.
13
Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.