Firsov v. Aerovias Del Continente Americano S.A. Avianca

Docket 5:25-cv-05481

Filed
2025-06-30
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

other dismissal

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=71 OFFICE=5 DOCKET=2505481 FILEDATE=06/30/2025 DISP=14, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 8 SERGEY FIRSOV, et al., Case No. 25-cv-05481-VKD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 10 Vv. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 11 AEROVIAS DEL CONTINENTE Re: Dkt. No. 38 AMERICANO S.A. AVIANCA, 12 Defendant. v 14 On October 30, 2025, plaintiffs Sergey Firsov and Kateryna Pomogaibo filed a motion for 15 || default judgment. Dkt. No. 38. The Court denies plaintiffs’ motion, as the Clerk of the Court Q 16 || declined to enter default against defendant Aerovias Del Continente Americano S.A. Avianca, = 17 Dkt. No. 31. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)-(b); Duyen Kwong v. Santa Clara Cnty. Sheriff's Off., No. Z 18 17-cv-02127-BLF, 2017 WL 8294176, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 7, 2017) (denying motion for default 19 || judgment where plaintiff “did not secure an entry of default by the Clerk” and defendants 20 || appeared by filing a motion to dismiss). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 || Dated: October 31, 2025 23 24 Virginia K. DeMarchi 5 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.