Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections

Docket 1:25-cv-04971

Filed: 2025-06-11
Terminated: 2025-07-15
Case type: cv

Outcome

other judgment · defendant

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2504971 FILEDATE=06/11/2025 DISP=17, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=2; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

Party and firm records are not available for this case.

Panel

No sourced panel votes are recorded.

Opinions and documents

Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections 2025-07-11 · Source
Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections 2025-07-15 · Source
Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections 2025-08-19 · Source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
YEHUDAH TZIYONKEISH  MILCHAMOT, 
                        Petitioner, 
            -against-                                  25 CIVIL 4971 (KMW) 
                                                     JUDGMENT 
NEW YORK CITY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 
                        Respondent. 
wa eK 
      It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:  That for the reasons 
stated in the Court's Order dated July 11, 2025, the Court denies Petitioner's application for a 
writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and repeats the warning issued in Milchamot v. 
Chief Bronx Dist. Attorney, No. 25-CV-1157 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2025) (Cronan, J.). Because 
Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court 
declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under 28 
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and 
therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United 
States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). 
Dated:  New York, New York 
       July 15, 2025 
                                                 TAMMI M. HELLWIG 
                                                Clerkof Court 

                                          BY:      ER 
                                               ‘Deputy Clerk

Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.