UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SHYAMAL GHOSH,
Plaintiff,
25-CV-4509 (LTS)
-against-
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE
NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION
et al.,
Defendants.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff
must either pay $405.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $55.00 administrative fee – or, to
request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees,
submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.
Plaintiff submitted the complaint without a self-styled IFP application that does not
include all of the information requested in the court’s IFP application. Within thirty days of the
date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $405.00 in fees or submit the attached amended
IFP application using the court’s form. If Plaintiff submits the amended IFP application, it should
be labeled with docket number 25-CV-4509 (LTS). If the Court grants the amended IFP
application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(1).
No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be
processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply
with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf.
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates
good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2025
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.