IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL A. RUDD,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 3:25-cv-402-jdp
FRANK BISIGNANO,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
Pursuant to the parties’ joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon
substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(¢)
reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner
according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S, 292, 296 (1993);
Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, an administrative law judge (ALJ) will offer Plaintiff the opportunity
for an administrative hearing. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential disability
evaluation process, including reevaluating the medical source assessments, as
appropriate. The AL] shall issue a new decision.
SO ORDERED this__/? of SEPTEMBER o095.
□ oe O. Btn
Honorable James D. Peterson
United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.