UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
NIGEL LUCOMBE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 8:25-cv-911-KKM-LSG
HAWK HOMES, LLC and
DAVID MISIALEK,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER
The pro se plaintiff Nigel Lucombe requests permission to file electronically.
Doc. 2. Lucombe explains that filing electronically is quicker, cheaper, and more
efficient than filing documents in person at the courthouse. Doc. 2 at 2.
“Absent a court order, a pro se litigant is not permitted to file documents in
CM/ECF.” Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing (M.D. Fla. Apr. 1,
2024); see Local Rule 1.01(c) (“By administrative order, the court can prescribe
procedures governing electronic filing.”). In this district, permission to file
electronically typically occurs only if the pro se party shows “good cause” or
“extenuating circumstances.” Gerow v. Blackwell, No: 8:24-cv-02280-KKM-NHA,
2024 WL 4679030, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2024) (quoting Hooker v. Wilkie, No. 8:20-
cv-1248-T-02CPT, 2020 WL 6947482, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2020)).
Lucombe describes nothing constituting good cause or an extenuating
circumstance. Gerow, 2024 WL 4679030, at *1. Lucombe describes no unusual
burden impacting his filing of documents. See Cromity v. City of Orlando, No: 6:24-cv-
1688-CEM-DCI, 2025 WL 435901, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2025). Rather,
Lucombe’s burden is common to all pro se parties and, absent more, fails to justify
allowing CM/ECF access. Gerow, 2024 WL 4679030, at *1.
A pro se party may file documents electronically through the Court’s web
portal. Jd. If Lucombe uses the web portal, he need not submit his filings in person or
through the U.S. Mail. Jd. The portal is available on the Court’s website at
https://www .flmd.uscourts.gov/electronic-document-submission-web-portal.
Lucombe may continue to use PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)
to view and print the documents in this case.” Accordingly, Lucombe’s motion is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
ORDERED on this 18th day of April, 2025.
), Dp.
NDSAY S. GRIKF
United States Magistrate Judge
“Lucombe says that he has registered for the “Florida Courts E-Filing Portal
(pacer.uscourts.gov/file-case) and has the technical capabilities to file documents electronically.”
Doc. 2 at 1. Lucombe may use his PACER account to review and print case documents once filed.
PACER sets a standard rate of $0.10 per page for access to court documents. See United States
Courts, Electronic Public Access Fee Schedule (Dec. 31, 2019), https://www.uscourts.gov/services-
forms/fees/electronic-public-access-fee-schedule. The Court may grant an exception to the PACER
fee schedule to indigent litigants upon demonstration that such an exemption is applicable. Lucombe
has not done so here.
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.