Kenyatta v. The City of New York

Docket 1:25-cv-02868

Filed: 2025-04-04
Terminated: 2025-07-18
Case type: cv

Outcome

other judgment · defendant

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2502868 FILEDATE=04/04/2025 DISP=17, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=2; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

Party and firm records are not available for this case.

Panel

No sourced panel votes are recorded.

Opinions and documents

Kenyatta v. The City of New York 2025-04-09 · Source
Kenyatta v. The City of New York 2025-07-18 · Source
Kenyatta v. The City of New York 2025-07-16 · Source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
wee K 
CHARLES KENYATTA JR A.K.A. 
CHARLIECEE, 
                  Plaintiff, 
      -against-                                  25 CIVIL 2868 (KMW) 
                                                 JUDGMENT 
THE CITY OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK CITY 
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND 
RECREATION; THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 
                  Defendants. 
wee K 
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:  That for the reasons 
stated in the Court's Order dated July 16, 2025, the Court dismisses without prejudice any claims 
Plaintiff seeks to bring on behalf of the Kenyatta Foundation. The Court dismisses Plaintiffs 
claims brought on his own behalf without prejudice for lack of standing, and therefore, for lack 
of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Clerk of Court is directed to 
terminate all pending motions. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal 
from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the 
purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). 
Dated:  New York, New York 
 July 18, 2025 
                                           TAMMI M. HELLWIG 
                                               Clerk of Court 

                                    BY:                
                                               Deputy Clerk

Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.