Crowell v. Audible Inc

Docket 2:25-cv-00606

Filed
2025-04-04
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

other judgment · defendant

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=81 OFFICE=2 DOCKET=2500606 FILEDATE=04/04/2025 DISP=17, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=2; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 GLORIA CROWELL, et al., CASE NO. C25-0606-KKE 10 Plaintiff(s), ORDER TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL v. BRIEFING 11 AUDIBLE INC., 12 Defendant(s). 13 14 Defendant’s motion to dismiss is currently pending (Dkt. No. 33), and Plaintiffs and 15 Defendant both filed notices of supplemental authority after briefing was complete. See Dkt. Nos. 16 44, 45. The Court ORDERS the parties to provide supplemental briefs of no more than five pages 17 in length no later than July 25, 2025, addressing: 18 (1) How, if at all, the Ninth Circuit memoranda referenced in the notices of supplemental 19 authority impact arguments you made with respect to the pending motion to dismiss; 20 and 21 (2) Whether this case should be stayed pending a ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the appeal 22 of Popa v. PSP Group, LLC, No. C23-0294JLR, 2023 WL 7001456 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 23 24, 2023), which is cited in the motion to dismiss. 24 1 The clerk is directed to RE-NOTE Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 33) for July 2 25, 2025. 3 Dated this 1st day of July, 2025. 4 A 5 Kymberly K. Evanson 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.