Melendez v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Docket 1:25-cv-01425

Filed
2025-02-19
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

settled

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2501425 FILEDATE=02/19/2025 DISP=13, PROCPROG=5, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, 25-CV-1425 (RWL) - against - ORDER OF DISMISSAL METRO-NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD, ~ : Defendant. ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court having been advised by the parties that all claims asserted in this action have been settled (Dkt. 28), it is ordered that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs (except as the parties may agree in settlement); provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within sixty days of this Order, either party may apply by letter within that period to restore the action to the calendar. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order, and any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement must be filed publicly, and an order of the Court must be entered to that effect within the sixty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). Any pending motions are moot and shall be terminated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions, vacate all remaining conference dates and other deadlines, and close this case. SO ORDERED. ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: February 19, 2026 New York, New York Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record.

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.