Songer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Docket 5:25-cv-00153

Filed
2025-02-03
Terminated
2025-04-07
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DUSTY AARON SONGER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) -vs- ) NO. CIV-25-0153-HE ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER Petitioner Dusty Aaron Songer, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On March 14, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the interest of justice warrants the transfer of the matter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Magistrate Judge Erwin advised petitioner of the right to object to the Report and Recommendation by March 31, 2025. To date, petitioner has neither filed an objection nor sought additional time to file one. Petitioner therefore has waived the right to appellate review of both factual and legal questions addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #10]. In the interest of justice, petitioner’s § 2241 habeas action is TRANSFERRED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. IT ISSO ORDERED. Dated this 7th day of April, 2025. ht Lhe JO XTON STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.