UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
BS DIS IC 24S BIS DIS IS DIC IC 34S IC 24S BIC 24S DIC 2g OIC IC 34K SS 3S OIC 3g 2
GARY KINSEY,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 25-0780
v.
FRANK BISIGNANO CONSENT ORDER TO
COMMISSIONER REMAND PURSUANT TO
OF SOCIAL SECURITY, SENTENCE 4 OF
42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
Defendant.
BE DIS IC DIR BIS DIS 2S DIS IC 24S BIS DC DIC OC DIC IS OIC □□ BIS 2c
This matter having been opened to the Court by JAY CLAYTON, United States Attorney
for the Southern District of New York, and Kristina Cohn, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, attorneys for Defendant, for an Order remanding the within cause of action to the
Defendant pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that further administrative action may
be taken, a new hearing will be offered, and a new decision will be issued; and Plaintiff, through
the undersigned attorney, having consented to the within order and the requested remand, and the
Court having considered the matter,
IT IS on this 16th day of June, 2025 ;
ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED, and the
matter is REMANDED to the Defendant for this further administrative action, and it is further
ORDERED that the within matter, be and hereby is, DISMISSED in accord with the decision in
Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
Judge Jennifer E. Willis
United States District Court
June 16, 2025
The undersigned hereby consent to the form and entry of the within order.
JAY CLAYTON
United States Attorney
By: /s Kristina Cohn
Kristina Cohn
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of Program Litigation, Office 2
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Phone: 212-264-2179
Email: kristina.cohn@ssa.gov
OLINSKY LAW GROUP
By: Ve D. a
Attorney for Plaintiff
250 South Clinton Street
Suite 210
Syracuse, NY 13202
Phone: 315-701-5781
Email: holinsky@windisability.com
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.