Beasley v. Social Security Administration

Docket 3:24-cv-00208

Filed
2024-11-06
Terminated
2025-03-07
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION GEORGE BEASLEY PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:24-cv-00208-KGB-JTK KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DEFENDANT Acting Commissioner Social Security ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff George Beasley’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. No. 1) Mr. Beasley’s application shows he earns $5,642.21 per month. The listed expenses total to $3,282.96 per month, including a car payment “for a friend.” The purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is to ensure that indigent litigants have an entre, not a barrier, to the federal courts. In re Williamson, 786 F.2d 1336, 1338 (8th Cir. 1986) (quoting Souder v. McGuire, 516 F.2d 820, 823 (3rd Cir. 1975)). Although a claimant need not be completely destitute to take advantage of the IFP statute, he or she must show that paying the filing fee would result in an undue financial hardship. Williamson, 786 F.2d at 1338. With the information provided to the Court, Mr. Beasley has not established that he is indigent or that paying the filing fee would result in undue financial hardship. Accordingly, his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. If Mr. Beasley wishes to proceed with this action, he must pay the applicable filing fee, within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Order. Failure to comply within the required period of time may result in summary dismissal of Mr. Beasley’s complaint. SO ORDERED THIS 26th day of November, 2024. JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.