IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROYCE RITCHESON, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. 24-cv-1856-RJD1
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL )
SECURITY, )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DALY, Magistrate Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees
and Expenses (Doc. 23). The parties agree and stipulate to an award of attorney fees and expenses
in the amount of $3,775 (THREE-THOUSAND, SEVEN-HUNDRED, AND SEVENTY-FIVE
DOLLARS). (Id.).
The Court finds that Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney’s
fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). The Court further
finds that the amount sought is reasonable and appropriate. Therefore, the Joint Motion to Award
Attorney Fees and Expenses (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $3,775 (THREE-
THOUSAND, SEVEN-HUNDRED, AND SEVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS) for attorney fees and
expenses in full satisfaction of any and all claims that may be payable to Plaintiff in this matter
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
1 This case was assigned to the undersigned for final disposition upon consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§636(c). (Doc. 10) .
Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and not his attorney and can be offset to satisfy any pre-
existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If
Defendant can verify that Plaintiff does not owe a pre-existing debt to the government subject to
offset, Defendant will direct that the award be made payable to Joseph Frydman pursuant to the
EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff. If payment is mailed, as compared to electronically
deposited, it shall be mailed to counsel’s address of record:
Joseph Frydman, Esq.
Frydman Law LLC
1700 Reisterstown Road
Suite 202
Baltimore, Maryland 21208
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 4, 2025
s/ Reona J. Daly
Hon. Reona J. Daly
United States Magistrate Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.