Sisnero-Gil v. United States

Docket 1:23-cv-03833

Filed
2023-05-04
Terminated
2025-03-14
Case type
cv

Outcome

other dismissal

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2303833 FILEDATE=05/04/2023 DISP=14, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -v- No. 15-cr-605-4 (RJS) MARLON SISNERO-GIL, Defendant. MARLON SISNERO-GIL, Petitioner, -v- No. 23-cv-3833 (RJS) ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-Defendant Marlon Sisnero-Gil has moved for relief from his conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, principally asserting that his prior counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea and sentencing. (Doc. No. 250.) After reviewing Sisnero-Gil’s motion papers, the government has concluded that the testimony of Petitioner’s former counsel, Oliver Storch (“Prior Counsel”), will be needed in order to allow the government to respond to certain aspects of the motion, and requests that the Court direct Prior Counsel to provide sworn testimony, in the form of an affidavit or affirmation, addressing the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel made by Petitioner. (Doc. No. 252.) The government also requests that Petitioner be ordered to execute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege in light of his assertions of ineffective assistance. (Id.) Sisnero-Gil has subsequently filed a signed waiver of his attorney-client privilege. (Doc. No. 253.) claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, Frias v. United States, No. 01-cr-307 (JFK), 2009 WL 1437797, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 2009) (quoting United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir. 1991)), and because the Court is satisfied that the testimony of Prior Counsel is needed to resolve at least some portions of the petition, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, by September 18, 2023, Prior Counsel shall provide sworn testimony, in the form of an affidavit or affirmation, addressing the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel made by Petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the government shall file its opposition to the petition by October 2, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Petitioner shall file his reply, if any, no later than October 31, 2023. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 23, 2023 New York, New York ___________________________________ RICHARD J. SULLIVAN UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Sitting by Designation

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.