Alhawari v. Kijakazi

Docket 3:22-cv-00504

Filed
2022-04-12
Terminated
2023-02-02
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=74 OFFICE=3 DOCKET=2200504 FILEDATE=04/12/2022 DISP=11, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 |} MOHAMAD A., Case No.: 22-cv-00504-AGS 5 Plainift,) ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR 6 || SUMMARY JUDGMENT 7 Kilolo KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of (ECF Nos. 13 & 15) Social Security, Defendant. 10 11 On February 1, 2023, the Court heard argument on plaintiff's appeal of his denial of 12 || disability benefits. For the reasons set out on the record, the Court finds that the 13 || Administrative Law Judge failed to give “‘specific, clear and convincing reasons’” for 14 || discounting plaintiff's testimony. Ghanim v. Colvin, 763 F.3d 1154, 1163 (9th Cir. 2014) 15 (quoting Vasquez v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2009)); see also Brown-Hunter v. 16 || Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015) (rejecting an ALJ adverse-credibility 17 ||determination when she merely listed medical evidence that purportedly supported her 18 || conclusion without explanation). 19 Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (ECF 13) is GRANTED, the 20 Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF 15) is DENIED, and the case 21 remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with 22 || this opinion. The Clerk is directed to issue a judgment and to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 || Dated: February 2, 2023 25 — | 4 6 Hon. Andrew G. Schopler United States Magistrate Judge 27 28

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.