Pelayo v. Kijakazi

Docket 7:22-cv-01725

Filed
2022-03-01
Terminated
2022-11-14
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=7 DOCKET=2201725 FILEDATE=03/01/2022 DISP=11, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X DANIEL PELAYO, Plaintiff, 7:22 CIVIL 1725 (PED) -v- JUDGMENT KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated November 14, 2022, that the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") be reversed and the above-captioned action be remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Section 405(g) provides that the Court has the power "to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of record, a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the decision of the [Commissioner], with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing." Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Remand for further development of the record is appropriate when gaps exist in the administrative record or where the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") has committed legal error. See Parker v. Harris, 626 F.2d 225, 235 (2d Cir. 1980). Upon review of the record, the Commissioner finds that further development of the record and additional administrative action is warranted. Should the Appeals Council remand to an ALJ, upon remand the ALJ will conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, including offering Plaintiff a new hearing, and issuing a new decision. Due to the nature of this motion, no supporting Memorandum is necessary. The parties further consent to the Court's entry of a final order. For the foregoing reasons, the Commissioner requests that this Court enter an Order and Judgment reversing the Commissioner's decision and remanding this case to the Commissioner for additional administrative proceedings, as described above. AND, the Court having reviewed this matter, IT IS So Ordered. Dated: New York, New York November 14, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: TR Deputy Clerk

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.