UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------X
DANIEL PELAYO,
Plaintiff, 7:22 CIVIL 1725 (PED)
-v- JUDGMENT
KILOLO KIJAKAZI,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons
stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated November 14, 2022, that the final decision of
the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") be reversed and the above-captioned
action be remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Section 405(g) provides that the
Court has the power "to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of record, a judgment affirming,
modifying or reversing the decision of the [Commissioner], with or without remanding the cause
for a rehearing." Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Remand for further development of
the record is appropriate when gaps exist in the administrative record or where the
Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") has committed legal error. See Parker v. Harris, 626 F.2d
225, 235 (2d Cir. 1980). Upon review of the record, the Commissioner finds that further
development of the record and additional administrative action is warranted. Should the Appeals
Council remand to an ALJ, upon remand the ALJ will conduct further proceedings and develop
the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the
meaning of the Social Security Act, including offering Plaintiff a new hearing, and issuing a new
decision. Due to the nature of this motion, no supporting Memorandum is necessary. The parties
further consent to the Court's entry of a final order. For the foregoing reasons, the Commissioner
requests that this Court enter an Order and Judgment reversing the Commissioner's decision and
remanding this case to the Commissioner for additional administrative proceedings, as described
above. AND, the Court having reviewed this matter, IT IS So Ordered.
Dated: New York, New York
November 14, 2022
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court
BY: TR
Deputy Clerk
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.