Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Docket 4:21-cv-00366

Filed
2021-09-13
Terminated
2022-09-27
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=70 OFFICE=4 DOCKET=2100366 FILEDATE=09/13/2021 DISP=11, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sandra Lopez, No. CV-21-00366-TUC-DCB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 The Honorable Court having reviewed the Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees 17 Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) and good cause appearing, 18 Accordingly, 19 IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees 20 Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) (Doc. 31), Plaintiff is 21 awarded the total sum of TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-SIX and 22 09/100 DOLLARS ($2336.09) for her attorney fees. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney’s fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s 24 attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset 25 against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue 26 v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, payment shall be paid via 27 check made payable to Plaintiff’s attorneys at Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm. If Plaintiff 28 ///// has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to 2|| Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney’s office. No costs or expenses are paid herein. 3 Dated this 21st day of December, 2022. 4 SS SY ' Honorabje David C. But 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.