Pasqual v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Docket 4:21-cv-00328

Filed
2021-08-17
Terminated
2023-02-27
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=70 OFFICE=4 DOCKET=2100328 FILEDATE=08/17/2021 DISP=11, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tina Pasqual, No. CV-21-00328-TUC-DCB (JR) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 The Honorable Court having reviewed the Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees 16 Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) and good cause appearing, 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Stipulation (Doc. 28), the Plaintiff is awarded 19 the total sum of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED and 90/100 DOLLARS ($2500.90) 20 for attorney fees. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney’s fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s 22 attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset 23 against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue 24 v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, payment shall be paid via 25 check made payable to Plaintiff’s attorneys at Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm. If Plaintiff 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made 2|| to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney’s office. There are no expenses or costs to be || paid herein. 4 Dated this 7th day of April, 2023. 5 SS SY ° Honorabje David C. But ? United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.