1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 RICO LYNTICE RILEY, No. 2:18-cv-03050-TLN-KJN
12 Petitioner,
13 v. ORDER
14 PATRICK COVELLO, et al.,
15 Respondents.
16
17 Petitioner Rico Lyntice Riley (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed
18 an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was
19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
20 302.
21 On November 2, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 34.) Neither
24 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
25 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
26 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
27 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
28 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings
2 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 2, 2020 (ECF No. 34), are
5 adopted in full; and
6 2. Petitioner’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 28) is DENIED.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 DATED: December 14, 2020
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.