U.S. District Court, Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia Oliver v. Metro Transit Docket 3:25-cv-02932
Filed 2025-10-30
Terminated Not recorded
Case type cv Outcome other dismissal
FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=74 OFFICE=3 DOCKET=2502932 FILEDATE=10/30/2025 DISP=14, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf
Outcome source Parties and representation Party and firm records are not available for this case.
Panel No sourced panel votes are recorded.
Opinions and documents 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 MILO L. OLIVER, Case No.: 25-cv-2932-AJB-VET
BOOKING #25730390
12
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff,
13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
vs. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
14
15
METRO TRANSIT, ALPHA PROJECT
16 and HUMANE SOCIETY,
17 Defendants.
18
19 Plaintiff Milo L. Oliver, a San Diego County Jail detainee proceeding pro se, has
20 filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 along with a motion to proceed
21 in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 1–2.)
22 I. Motion to Proceed IFP
23 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the
24 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of
25 $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55,
26 although the administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP.
27 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee
28 Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023)). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to
1 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
2 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). Section
3 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP to submit a “certified copy of
4 the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period
5 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v.
6 King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the
7 Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account
8 for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six
9 months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has insufficient assets. See 28 U.S.C.
10 §§ 1915(b)(1)&(4); Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016). Prisoners who proceed IFP
11 must pay any remaining balance in “increments” or “installments,” regardless of whether
12 their action is ultimately dismissed. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(b)(1)&(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84.
13 Plaintiff’s IFP application does not contain a trust fund account statement. (See ECF
14 No. 2.) The Court cannot grant his IFP application without a trust fund account statement
15 containing financial information for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing
16 of his Complaint. See Andrews, 398 F.3d at 1119 (“[P]risoners must demonstrate that they
17 are not able to pay the filing fee with an affidavit and submission of their prison trust
18 account records.”) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1)&(2)).
19 Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. This action
20 is DISMISSED without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or to
21 submit a properly supported motion to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) &
22 1915(a).
23 II. Conclusion and Order
24 Accordingly, the Court:
25 (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP without prejudice.
26 (2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to
27 pay the civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a properly supported motion to
28 proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a).
1 (3) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed
2 || to: (a) prepay the entire $405 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and
3 || file a properly supported motion to proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his
4 || prison trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint.
5 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $405
6 || civil filing fee or submit a properly supported motion to proceed IFP within 45 days, this
7 |{action will remain dismissed without prejudice based solely on his failure to satisfy
8 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee requirement and without further Order of the Court.
9 IT ISSO ORDERED
10 || Dated: November 21, 2025 © ¢
Hon. Anthony J. attaglia
12 United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer .