Doe v. G6 Hospitality, LLC

Docket 2:25-cv-03142

Filed
2025-10-28
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE DOE, et al. No. 2:25-cv-03142-DC-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 G6 HOSPITALITY, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court reviewed the 18 parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 34) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] 19 with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before 20 issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). 21 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 22 Defendants G6 Hospitality, LLC; G6 Hospitality IP, LLC; G6 Hospitality Property, LLC; 23 G6 Hospitality Purchasing, LLC; G6 Hospitality Franchising, LLC; Motel 6 Operating LP; and 24 Pravin G. Patel have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and have 25 appeared in this action. The only other defendant, Defendant D Mod Hotel, LLC, was served on 26 November 14, 2025, but has not appeared in this action. (Doc. No. 16.) Accordingly, Plaintiffs 27 shall file either a request for the entry of default as to Defendant D Mod Hotel, LLC, or a notice 28 of voluntary dismissal of their claims brought against Defendant D Mod Hotel, LLC, by no later 1 than February 27, 2026. 2 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown 3 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 4 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 5 The parties do not anticipate the joinder of additional parties or amendment of the 6 pleadings. 7 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of 8 court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth 9 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992). The parties are advised that the filing of 10 motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not imply good cause to 11 modify the existing schedule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(4); see also Johnson, 975 F. 2d at 609. 12 Moreover, any amendment requested under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) must not be: 13 (1) prejudicial to the opposing party; (2) the product of undue delay; (3) proposed in bad faith; or 14 (4) futile. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 15 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 16 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case are referred to the 17 assigned magistrate judge, who will hear all discovery disputes subject to his or her procedures. 18 (The assigned magistrate judge’s initials follow the district judge’s initials next to the case 19 number.) All discovery related filings must include the words “DISCOVERY MATTER” in the 20 caption to ensure proper routing. Do not direct delivery of courtesy copies of these documents to 21 the district judge. Counsel are directed to contact the magistrate judge’s courtroom deputy clerk 22 to schedule discovery matters for hearing. 23 All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the assigned magistrate judge’s 24 calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and the magistrate judge’s own 25 procedures. The written ruling of the assigned magistrate judge shall be final, subject to 26 modification by the district court only where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order 27 is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Pursuant to Local Rule 303, 28 any party may file and serve a “Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate 1 Judge’s Ruling.” See L.R. 303(c). The requesting party must file and serve any such request 2 within fourteen (14) days of service of a written ruling. L.R. 303(b). The request must specify 3 which portions of the ruling are clearly erroneous or contrary to law and the basis for that 4 contention with supporting points and authorities. L.R. 303(c). 5 In addition, the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective 6 orders sought by the parties pursuant to Local Rule 141.1. However, any requests to seal or redact 7 in connection with trial or motions to be resolved by Judge Coggins must be directed to Judge 8 Coggins and comply with her Standing Order and Local Rules 140 and 141. 9 IV. DISCOVERY DEADLINES 10 A. Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures 11 The parties shall serve their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 Rule 26(a)(1) no later than 14 days after the date of entry of this scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 26(a)(1)(C). 14 Any parties served or joined after the issuance of this scheduling order shall “make the 15 initial disclosures within 30 days after being served or joined,” as provided by Rule 26(a)(1)(D). 16 B. Fact Discovery 17 All fact discovery shall be completed1 no later than March 26, 2027, which is a date 18 proposed by the parties. The parties do not propose any limitations or changes to the governing 19 provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 20 C. Expert Discovery 21 Disclosures of expert witnesses, if any, must be made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 26(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C), and shall include all information required thereunder. Each 23 expert witness must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the 24 1 As used herein, the word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so 25 that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 26 been obeyed. The parties are advised that motions to compel must be filed in advance of the 27 discovery completion deadlines so that the court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the 28 discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 1 disclosures. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of appropriate 2 sanctions, including the preclusion of the expert’s testimony, or of other evidence offered through 3 the expert. 4 The parties shall disclose initial experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal 5 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than April 26, 2027. With regard to expert testimony 6 intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and reports produced in accordance 7 with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or before May 26, 2027. 8 All expert discovery shall be completed no later than June 25, 2027. 9 V. MOTIONS 10 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other 11 emergency applications, shall be filed on or before August 24, 2027 and shall be noticed for 12 hearing before Judge Coggins on a date not more than 60 days from the date the motion is filed 13 and on a date that is listed on Judge Coggins’s website as an available civil law and motion 14 hearing date. Counsel are directed to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for 15 noticing and opposing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. 16 Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for partial summary judgment 17 (summary adjudication), the parties are ordered to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, to 18 discuss the issues to be raised in the motion. In addition to complying with the requirements of 19 Local Rule 260, the parties must prepare a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, which identifies 20 all relevant facts subject to agreement by all parties. The moving party is responsible for filing the 21 joint statement concurrently with the motion. In the notice of motion, the moving party shall 22 certify that the parties have met and conferred as ordered above or provide a statement of good 23 cause for the failure to do so. 24 The parties shall refer to Judge Coggins’s Standing Order for her procedures with regard 25 to the filing of cross-motions for summary judgment and related briefing. 26 VI. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 27 The undersigned requires parties to participate in a court-supervised settlement conference 28 with a settlement judge before the action may proceed to trial. A settlement conference has not 1 been set at this time. At any time before the final pretrial conference, the parties may file a joint 2 request that this action be referred to a settlement judge for the setting of a settlement conference. 3 If the parties have not participated in a court-supervised settlement conference by the time of the 4 final pretrial conference, the court will refer the action at that time to the assigned magistrate 5 judge for the setting of a settlement conference. The parties shall contact the designated 6 settlement conference judge’s chambers to ascertain that judge’s settlement conference 7 procedures, including the procedure for submitting confidential settlement statements, which shall 8 not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the trial judge. 9 Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the attorneys who will try the case 10 shall appear at the settlement conference. Pertinent evidence to be offered at trial, documents or 11 otherwise, should be brought to the settlement conference for presentation to the settlement judge. 12 Neither the settlement conference statements nor communications during the settlement 13 conference with the settlement judge can be used by either party in the trial of this case. 14 Absent permission from the court, in addition to counsel who will try the case being 15 present, the individual parties shall also be present, and in the case of corporate parties, 16 associations or other entities, and insurance carriers, a representative executive with unrestricted 17 authority to discuss, consider, propose and agree, or disagree, to any settlement proposal or offer 18 shall also be present. If for any reason the representative with unlimited authority cannot attend, 19 such a person must be available by phone or video throughout the conference. In other words, 20 having settlement authority “up to a certain amount” is not acceptable. 21 VII. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 22 The court will not set a final pretrial conference date in this scheduling order. Instead, 23 upon resolution of any motions filed by the deadline set forth in Section V of this order, or upon 24 the expiration of that deadline if no such motions were filed, the court will set a date for a final 25 pretrial conference, which will be conducted in person in Courtroom 10. The court will not 26 entertain requests to conduct the final pretrial conference by Zoom. 27 The parties are directed to file a joint pretrial statement, carefully prepared and executed 28 by all counsel, that complies with the requirements of this Local Rule 281 and Judge Coggins’s 1 Standing Order. Counsel shall also email a copy of the joint pretrial statement in Word format to 2 Judge Coggins’s chambers at dcorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The parties’ attention is directed to 3 Local Rules 281 and 282. This court will insist upon strict compliance with these rules. 4 At the final pretrial conference, the court will set a trial date and deadlines to file trial 5 documents, including motions in limine, trial briefs, and proposed jury voir dire, instructions, and 6 verdict forms (where applicable). In addition, at the final pretrial conference, the parties shall 7 have a joint list of proposed trial dates that are within 60 to 120 days from the date of the final 8 pretrial conference, and the parties shall be prepared to confirm a trial date. 9 VIII. REQUEST FOR BIFURCATION, APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER, OR 10 OTHER TECHNIQUES TO SHORTEN TRIAL 11 The parties have not made any such requests at this time and do not anticipate any such 12 requests. 13 IX. RELATED MATTERS PENDING 14 The parties have not alerted the court to any related litigation. 15 X. OBJECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER 16 This case schedule will become final without further order of the court unless 17 objections are filed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order. The schedule, once 18 final, shall not be modified except by leave of court upon showing of good cause. The assigned 19 magistrate judge is authorized to modify the discovery dates set forth in Section IV of this order, 20 but only to the extent that any such modification does not impact the motions filing deadline set 21 forth in Section V of this order. A stipulation or request by the parties to modify only the 22 discovery deadlines shall therefore be directed to the assigned magistrate judge. 23 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure, no stipulations extending scheduling requirements or modifying applicable rules are 25 effective until and unless the court approves them. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone 26 does not constitute good cause. Any request or stipulation to modify this scheduling order must 27 set forth: 28 (1) the existing due date or hearing date as well as the discovery cutoff date, and the ] last date for filing motions; 2 (2) whether there have been prior requests for extensions, and whether these were 3 granted or denied by the court; and 4 (3) specific, concrete reasons supporting good cause for granting of the extension. For 5 example, if the reason for the requested extension 1s that it “will promote 6 settlement,” the requesting party or parties must indicate the status of ongoing 7 negotiations, 1.e., have written proposals been exchanged; is counsel in the process 8 of reviewing a draft settlement agreement; has a mediator been selected. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. : 11 | Dated: _ February 13, 2026 Qe cs Dena Coggins 12 United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.