Martin v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION KIMBERLEY MARTIN § § VS. § ACTION NO. 4:25-CV-1221-Y § COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY § ADMINISTRATION § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION On May 1, 2026, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the above- styled and numbered cause. An order issued that same day gave all parties fourteen days thereafter to serve and file with the Court written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and has found none. Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision 1s REVERSED and REMANDED under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. S$ 405 (g). SIGNED May 29, 2026. — TERR - MEANS UNIT STATES DISTRICT JUDGE