Williams v. Bisignano

Docket 2:25-cv-01630

Filed
2025-10-23
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MELISSA NICOLE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Case No. 25-cv-1630-pp v. FRANK J. BISIGNANO, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR AWARD UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (DKT. NO. 25) On August 12, 2026, the parties filed a stipulated motion, asking the court to enter an order awarding attorneys’ fees and expenses costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Dkt. No. 25. The court GRANTS the stipulated motion for award under the EAJA. Dkt. No. 25. The court ORDERS that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount of $6,900, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims the plaintiff may have in this case under the EAJA. The court awards these fees and expenses to the plaintiff, not the plaintiff’s attorney, and under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the United States may offset the award to satisfy pre-existing debts that the litigant owes the United States. If counsel for the parties verify that the plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, the defendant shall direct that the award be made payable to the plaintiffs attorney under the EAJA assignment duly signed by the plaintiff and counsel. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 12th day of August, 2026. BY THE COURT: Z PAMELA PEPPER Chief United States District Judge

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.