Whitby v. Indiana Grocery Group, LLC

Docket 2:25-cv-00489

Filed
2025-10-22
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to state court

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=55 OFFICE=2 DOCKET=2500489 FILEDATE=10/22/2025 DISP=1, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION BASEL WHITBY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:25-CV-489-GSL-AZ INDIANA GROCERY GROUP, LLC, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abizer Zanzi’s report and recommendation, entered on November 13, 2025. [DE 8]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Zanzi recommends that the Court grant the parties’ joint Stipulation to Withdraw Notice of Removal [DE 6] and remand this matter to state court. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Zanzi’s report and recommendation in full and orders that the parties’ joint stipulation be GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the Lake County Superior Court for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: December 3, 2025 /s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.