Strickler v. Bisignano

Docket 4:25-cv-04198

Filed
2025-10-10
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=69 OFFICE=4 DOCKET=2504198 FILEDATE=10/10/2025 DISP=11, PROCPROG=3, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION JACOB LYLE STRICKLER, 4:25-CV-04198-VLD Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR vs. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FRANK BISIGNANO, COMMISSIONER DOCKET NO. 23 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; Defendant. Plaintiff moves for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Docket No. 23. The Commissioner does not object. See Docket No. 26. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is granted. Plaintiff is awarded EAJA attorneys’ fees and expenses in the total amount of $9,398.70 ($8,850.00 in attorney’s fees plus $548.70 in South Dakota sales tax) to be paid by the Social Security Administration. Funds shall be made payable to plaintiff but sent to plaintiff’s counsel after it has been determined there is no offset owed to the government by Jacob Lyle Strickler, or after such offset has been subtracted. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010). It is further ORDERED that the government shall pay to Jacob Lyle Strickler out of the Judgment Fund expenses in the form of the filing fee in this case of $405.00. DATED this 1st day of June, 2026. BY THE COURT: VERONICA L.DUFFY =———<“‘“‘“‘“‘ C ;OO”*” United States Magistrate Judge

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.