IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW _ YORK
BRADLEY BATTEASE,
Plaintiff,
-v- 1:25-CV-01391-ECC-ML
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
STIPULATION FOR REMAND
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Vernon Norwood,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, for John A. Sarcone III, First Assistant United States
Attorney for the Northern District of New York and Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General,
attorneys for the defendant herein, and Eddy Pierre Pierre, Esq., attorney for Plaintiff, that the final
decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the above-captioned action be remanded to the
Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth
sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the ALJ shall offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new
hearing, give further consideration of Plaintiffs residual functional capacity, take any further action
necessary to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. The Clerk is directed to
enter judgment. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
Dated: September 16, 2026
Syracuse, New York
The undersigned hereby consent to the form and entry of the within order.
John A. Sarcone III Pierre Pierre Law P.C.
First Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
y: /s/ Vernon Norwood By: /s/ Eddy Pierre Pierre
Vernon Norwood Eddy Pierre Pierre, Esq.
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 15 Park Place, 2" flr, suite 4
Program Litigation 2 Bronxville, NY 10708
Social Security Administration (646) 992-8383
Law & Policy fedcourt@pierrepierrelaw.com
Attn: Program Litigation 2
6401 Security Boulevard IT IS SO ORDERED:
Baltimore, MD 21235
(212) 264-9471 A ,
vernon.norwood@)ssa.gov Elizabeth C. Coombe
U.S. District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.