Cosentino Sands v. Stout Risius Ross, LLC

Docket 6:25-cv-01923

Filed
2025-10-03
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION AARON MICHAEL COSENTINO SANDS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:25-cv-1923-JSS-LHP STOUT RISIUS ROSS, LLC and HEALTHCARE APPRAISERS, LLC, Defendants ORDER (And Direction to Clerk of Court) This cause comes before the Court following a Case Management Conference pursuant to the Inexpensive Determination, Efficient, and Abbreviated Litigation (IDEAL) Program, held today. Doc. Nos. 3, 10, 13. As discussed with the parties at the Conference, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s oral request to receive case notifications via email (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED. See Moore v. Adventist Health Sys. Sunbelt Healthcare Corp., No. 6:23-cv-1163-PGB-DCI, 2023 WL 4947933, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2023). The Clerk of Court is directed to add Plaintiff’s email address, aaronsands4242@gmail.com, to CM/ECF and ensure that Plaintiff receives Notices of Electronic Filings. The Court also notes Plaintiff's consent at today’s hearing to service by email of all court documents from Defendant going forward. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E), (F). Plaintiff must still file all documents with the Court via U.S. Mail or hand delivery. 2. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, the parties shall either file a fully executed Stipulated Consent to the IDEAL Program and Magistrate Judge Authority signed by all parties (unilateral consents should not be filed) or submit the standard Case Management Report. See Doc. No. 3 4 4. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 17, 2025. LESLIE NOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.