Opinions and documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
______
TONY D. KINGSLEY,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-233
v. Honorable Ray Kent
DEREK J. FALIK et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER LIFTING STAY AND FOR SERVICE
This is a prisoner civil rights action. The Court previously referred the case to the Pro Se
Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation Early Mediation Program and entered an order staying the case
for any purpose other than mediation. Thereafter, the case was removed from the Pro Se Prisoner
Civil Rights Litigation Early Mediation Program because not all Defendants entered a limited
appearance within the Court’s deadline. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the stay of this proceeding that was entered to facilitate the
mediation is LIFTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed
in forma pauperis in an order entered on June 15, 2026, (ECF No. 4), Plaintiff is responsible for
paying the entire $350.00 filing fee in installments, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). See
McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled in other part by
LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); Hampton v. Hobbs, 106 F.3d 1281 (6th
Cir. 1997). Plaintiff must pay the filing fee through monthly payments of 20 percent of the
preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s prison trust fund account. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(2). Accordingly, each month that the amount in Plaintiff’s trust account exceeds $10.00,
the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall collect 20 percent of the preceding months’ income
and remit that amount to the Clerk of this Court. The agency shall continue to collect monthly
payments from Plaintiff’s prisoner account until the entire filing fee is paid.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 90-day period for service set forth in Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 4(m) shall run, starting with the date of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forward the complaint to the U.S.
Marshals Service, which is authorized to send a request for waiver of service to Defendants Falik,
Grant, Dow, Harry, Vampese, McAdams, Havenor, VanAcker, Nichols, Giotto, Kessler,
Schroeder, and Bolton in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). If waiver of service is
unsuccessful, summons shall issue and be forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each Defendant shall file an appearance of counsel
(individual Defendants may appear pro se if they do not have counsel) within 21 days of service
or, in the case of a waiver of service, 60 days after the waiver of service was sent. Until so ordered
by the Court, no Defendant is required to file an answer or motion in response to the complaint,
and no default will be entered for failure to do so. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(1). After a Defendant
has filed an appearance, the Court will enter a case management order to govern further
proceedings in this case.
Dated: July 27, 2026 /s/ Ray Kent
Ray Kent
United States Magistrate Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.